I have a question for pro-aborts who claim to be "for women": name one health benefit that women get from abortion. You can't, because it does great damage to women. So why would you insist that it be part of nationalized healthcare?When members of Congress return from their August recess, the first battle over the abortion funding found in the health care bills will occur in the House. There, it appears Democratic leaders will prevent a vote on an amendment to remove the abortion funding from the bill. Why are they afraid of a vote? Why the need to ram it down our throats?
The House version of the health care bill, HR 3200, currently allows a scheme whereby the federal government will pay for abortions under the plan.
Rep. Bart Stupak has announced that he will sponsor an amendment on the House floor to change that, similar to the one members of a House panel defeated.
But, House members may never have a chance to vote on the Stupak amendment to stop taxpayer-financed abortions because it appears House Democrats won't allow it.
In an interview this week, pro-abortion Rep. Louise Slaughter, who chairs the House Rules Committee, said there won't be many changes to the three versions of the bill that the House panels each approved.
"I don't foresee a lot of changes from what came out of committee," Slaughter said at a press conference.
story here
Catholic Bishops, Congressman: Allow Vote to Cut Abortion Funding From Bill
0 comments:
Post a Comment